The provisions for reviewing

(Русская версия)

1. All submitted articles are subject to review. Articles are accepted for consideration in strict compliance with the requirements for the author's original articles specified in the requirements section.

2. Received article is registered in the journal of registration of articles with the date of receipt, title, full Name of the author(s), place of work of the author(s). By e-mail the author(s) are notified of the receipt of the article to the Editor.

3. Articles are checked for compliance with the profile of the journal, the requirements for the design of articles, including checking the originality of the text on the system "Antiplagiat", and then sent for review.

4. Forms of reviewing articles:

-internal (review of manuscripts by members of the editorial Board - SINGLE-BLIND REVIEW);

-external (direction to review manuscripts of articles by leading experts in the relevant industry - DOUBLE-BLIND REVIEW).

The reviewer can be a specialist in the profile of the submitted article from among the editorial Board, the editorial Board, or an external reviewer, they are not associated with the author by the same institution.

5. The reviewer considers the submitted article within 2 weeks from the date of receipt, and prepares a review, which is sent to the Editor by e-mail

The review should cover the following issues:

-General characteristics of the article and its relevance;

-relevance of scientific terms and results of the study;

-the validity of scientific statements and results;

-significance of scientific provisions and results (from the point of view of development of science and prospects of practical application);

-comments on the presentation and design of the article;

-compliance of the article with the problems of the section (heading) of the journal and scientific specialty;

-is it appropriate to publish the article taking into account the previously published literature on this issue;

-conclusion about the possibility of publication of this manuscript in the journal: "recommended", "recommended taking into account the correction of deficiencies noted by the reviewer" or "not recommended" for publication in the journal.

The review is signed and certified by the reviewer in accordance with the established procedure. The maximum review period may not exceed 2 months.

6. The article, not recommended by the reviewer for publication, is not accepted for re-consideration. The text of the negative review is sent to the author by e-mail.

7. The presence of a positive review is not a sufficient basis for the publication of the article. The final decision on the appropriateness of the publication is made by the editor-in-chief. In case of rejection of the article from publication, the Editorial Board sends a reasoned refusal to the author.

8. All the reviews are kept in Editorial office of the journal "LEGAL ORDER: history, theory, practice" within 5 years.

For your information

Responsibility for authenticity and accuracy of quotations, names, titles, etc. information, as well as for compliance with laws on intellectual and other property the authors of the published materials are responsible.
© 2013-2020 editorial Board of the journal "LEGAL ORDER: history, theory, practice".
All rights reserved.




454091, Russia, Chelyabinsk region,
Chelyabinsk, Commune street, 139-39
Phone: 8 (908) 570-73-15